This judgment is a procedural order in a regular appeal where the appellant failed to engage counsel after a registry notice. The court listed the case for service of notice before the deadline and directed the registry to report on service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 79/2017 Date: 21.09.2022
Edelwiess Asset Reconstruction Company Vs. Net Four India Limited Company
Present: None for the parties,
Pursuant to the earlier order dated 05.07.2022, a notice was sent to the appellant by the Registry for engaging another counsel, but none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant till date.
List this case on 16.12.2022 for service, by which time the office of this Tribunal shall report, whether the notice has been served upon the appellant.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Edelwiess Asset Reconstruction Company
Net Four India Limited Company
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
