M S Traverse Vacations LLP v. Peagasus Group Three Trust-Iii
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant argued it never received notice under sections 13(2) or 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act as it is a tenant. Court listed before Chairperson on 21.09.2022 for direction. Order by Registrar only.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 75/2022
Arising out of S.A. No. 321/2022 (DRT, Jaipur)
M/s Traverse Vacations LLP
Vs
Peagasus Group Three Trust-iii
28.06.2022
Present: Mr. Gautam Kumar, counsel for appellant.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Counsel for the appellant submits that he has never received any notice under Section 13(2) or 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act because he is a tenant in the said premises.
List the matter before Hon’ble Chairperson for further direction on 21.09.2022.
(Rajmani Sinha) Registrar
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant, as a tenant, received notice under Section 13(2) or 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Traverse Vacations LLP
- respondent
Peagasus Group Three Trust-iii
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court