An appeal arising from S.A. 18 of 2019 (DRT-Cuttack) was listed for hearing on 5th July 2022. The court noted the presence of counsel for Respondent No. 3 and adjourned the matter due to lack of representation by other respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 74 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 18 of 2019 in DRT-Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
05.07.2022 Punjab National Bank
Appellant -VsUtkal Chromium Private Limited & ors. … Respondents Ms. Malabika Roy Dey Learned Counsel for Appellant. Mr. Ranjan Kr. Rout and Ms. Shikha Kumari Kashyap Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Aritra Kr. Roy and Ms. Atika Arrif Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.3 is present. Other Respondents have served but not represented. On the request of the Respondent No.3 listed on 1st September, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 5th July, 2022 13/RC
Punjab National Bank
Utkal Chromium Private Limited
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
