The Appellate Tribunal allowed an interim application for condonation of 115 days delay in filing the appeal and directed that the appeal be registered as a regular appeal.
Interim application for condonation of 115 days delay was allowed; appeal to be registered as regular appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal Dy. No. 98 of 2019)
(I.A. No. 416 of 2022)
(Arising out of O.A. 71 of 2007 in DRT- Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
25.08.2022
Punjab National Bank
… Appellant
-Vs-
Tejvangir Dhanrajgir & Ors
… Respondents
Ms.Aparjita Rao, learned counsel for the Appellant. None for the respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up for hearing. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to serve paper book upon the respondent.
I.A. 416 of 2019 is filed for condonation of delay of 115 days in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Appeal has been filed on 24.12.2018. It is submitted that delay is caused due to the reason in getting administrative approval in filing the appeal. The ground is sufficient for condoning the delay. I.A. is allowed. Delay condoned. Appeal is directed to be registered as regular appeal.
Issue notice to the respondent.
List on 24.11.2022 for hearing the appeal..
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 25th August, 2022 03/pkb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 115 days in filing the appeal should be condoned?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Punjab National Bank
Tejvangir Dhanrajgir
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
