Marvelyn Nongrum v. Meghalaya Rural Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This order admits an appeal and an interim application in a bankruptcy or debt recovery matter, setting adjournments for filing replies and for hearing the I.A.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to file supplementary applications; objection timeline fixed for I.As. 286 and 287.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal Dy. No. 428 of 2022)
(I.A. No. 286 of 2022)
(Arising out of O.A. 43 of 2021 in DRT- Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
25.08.2022
Marvelyn Mongrum
… Appellant
-Vs-
Meghalaya Rural Bank
… Respondents
Mr. S.K. Hazra, learned counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. A.K.Singh, learned counsel with Mr. S. Bandyopadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Marvelyn Mongrum
- respondent
Meghalaya Rural Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090004282022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court