Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd. v. Doha Bank Qsc
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 71/2020 Arising out of O.A. No. 207/2017 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd. Vs Doha Bank QSC
21.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Pragya Puri, Ld Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Abhijeet Nandi proxy for Rajiv M. Roy, Ld. Counsel for respondent bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Proxy counsel for appellant requests for an adjournment on the ground that main counsel is in personal difficulty.
At request of Ld. proxy counsel for the appellant list the matter on 31.01.2023 for final arguments.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd.
- respondent
Doha Bank QSC
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
19 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court