order was sent belonged to his associate. In the opinion of this Tribunal, the learned Receiver cannot take refuge under the said ground for the reason that he had written both his numbers on the notice and now faced with a situation where there is documentary record that copy of the order has been received on mobile number no.9971446332, he has shifted the burden and stated that the said number belongs to is associate. This, in the opinion of the Tribunal, is a very unfortunate situation and shows utter disregard for the order of the Court and undermines the majesty of law. It may be further pointed out that the fact that the order has been received by the learned Receiver on mobile number 9971446332 is clear from the snapshot of Whatsapp placed on record by the learned counsel for the respondents. Perusal of the snapshot reveals two ticks which clearly connotes that the order has been received by the Receiver. In such a scenario, when a person has been thrown out and dispossessed from his premises despite a restraint order passed by the Tribunal in his favour, the interest of justice demands that the possession should immediately be restored back and the Court order is given due regard and must be complied with in letter and spirit. It goes without saying that in case, the learned DRT comes to the conclusion that there is no substance in Section 17 application moved by the respondents, the possession will be returned to the bank. The bank is, therefore, directed to restore the possession of the property to the respondent within seven days from today, i.e. 21.11.2022.
