Appeal No. 69/2013 before DRAT Mumbai adjourned to explore settlement. No substantive decision rendered.
Time granted for settlement exploration; matter post-poned to 10.10.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 69/2013
Between
Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s.
Shri Siddhi Vinayak Trading Co. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr.Jayesh Patel, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Sohel E. Kazi, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
-: Order dated: 03/08/2022:-
The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that there is a possibility of settlement and hence the matter be adjourned to explore the possibility of settlement.
Time is granted.
The parties are directed to get ready for a hearing, positively, on the next date if there is no possibility of settlement.
Post on 10.10.2022 for reporting settlement/hearing.
dpj-22
1
Bank of Baroda
Shri Siddhi Vinayak Trading Co. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
