The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal recorded that the appellant was absent through video conferencing. The matter was adjourned pending appearance for admission hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 64/2021 Arising out of S.A. No. 30/2020 (DRT-I, Chandigarh)
Shri Pratap Singh Thakur Vs Deb Recovery Tribunal –I Chandigarh & Ors.
19.04.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for the appellant
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. However, in the interest of justice, list on 18.08.2022 for hearing on admission.
(CHAIRPERSON)
Some time after the adjournment, Mr. Rohit Suri has appeared on behalf of the appellant and he has been apprised of the next date of hearing.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Shri Pratap Singh Thakur
Deb Recovery Tribunal – I Chandigarh
Justice Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
