The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal ordered the disposal of the appeal by recording that the respondent failed to file any reply despite prior directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 64/2019
Between
Bank of Baroda
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Makjai Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent/s
Mr Amod Naik, i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Appellant. Mr Omkar R. Chitale, i/b Mr Chaitanya Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 15/11/2022:-
No representation for the Respondent. Neither has any reply filed as directed. It is recorded that the Respondent does not have any reply.
Post the Appeal for hearing on 07.02.2022.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-23
1
Bank of Baroda
Makjai Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
