Central Bank of India v. Mrs Amita Kapoor and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed matter adjourned due to unavailability of principal respondent counsel. No substantive decision rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.76/2022 In
M.A.No.579/2022
Arising out of S.A.No.49/2022 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Central Bank of India Vs
Amita Kapoor & Ors.
&
Appeal No.62/2022 Arising out of S.A.No.49/2022(DRT-II, Delhi)
Central Bank of India Vs
Amita Kapoor & Ors.
20.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Anuj Jain, Ld. Counsel for appellant bank.
Mr. Vijay Kumar proxy for Mr. R. Wali, Ld. Counsel for respondents.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Proxy counsel for respondents prays for an adjournment as the main counsel for respondents is not available.
List the matter on 06.12.2022. In case settlement is arrived, parties are at liberty to move early hearing application.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Central Bank of India
Amita Kapoor
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court