Registrar allowed fresh notice for Respondent No. 3 and required counsel for Respondents No. 4 to 6 to file replies by the next hearing.
Notice issued to Respondent No. 3; Vakalatnama to be filed shortly by Respondent No. 2; replies by Respondents No. 4 to 6 by next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 60/2021 Arising out of Appeal No. 34/2017 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
State Bank of India Vs M/s Bagarian Shoes Ltd. & Ors.
05.05.2022
Present: Mr. Abhijeet, proxy counsel for Appellant.
Mr. Anand Aggarwal & Ms. Reena Jain, counsel for Respondent no. 4 to 6
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Counsel for the appellant requests for fresh notice for Respondent No. 3. Request is allowed. Notice be issued for Respondent No. 3. Affidavit of service be filed on or before the next date of hearing i.e. 26.05.2022.
Counsel for the Respondent No. 4 to 6 has to file reply on or before the next date of hearing.
(Rajmani Sinha) Registrar
Mr. Atul Sharma, Counsel for Respondent No. 2, has appeared at 12:20 pm and submitted that he will file Vakalatnama shortly. He has been apprised of next date of hearing.
(Rajmani Sinha) Registrar
-pramod
State Bank of India
M/s Bagarian Shoes Ltd. & Ors.
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
