This order in Regular Appeal No. 53/2022 addressed the death of the appellant. The court set a deadline for the appellant to file a substitution application and a rejoinder to the respondent's reply by 30.11.2022, allowing the respondent further time to reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 53/2022 Date: 19.09.2022
Shailesh Prasad Srivastava Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank Shri P. K. Gupta, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has expired, therefore, he wants to file substitution application to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased appellant.
Learned counsel for the Bank seeks further time to file reply, which may be filed by the next date. Reply of the respondent no. 3 is on record. Learned counsel for the appellant may file rejoinder to the same by the next date.
List this case on 30.11.2022, by which date, the needful be done by the appellant.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Shailesh Prasad Srivastava
State Bank of India & Ors.
R. D. Khare
V. N. Giri
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
