The Appellate Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a supplementary affidavit regarding a pending amendment application and listed the matter for further arguments on 5th July 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 53 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 104 of 2018 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.04.2022 B. Shiva Shankar … Appellant -vsBank of India … Respondent Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Dipankar Das, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
During the course of argument, Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for, and is granted, two weeks time for filing supplementary affidavit on the point as to whether the amendment application moved before the Learned Tribunal was disposed of or not and if allowed, whether the amendment was carried out in the original S.A. before the Learned DRT; if so, whether opportunity of filing objection was given to the Bank or not; if so, whether Bank has filed any written statement against the amended petition before the Learned DRT.
List the matter on 5th July, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 28th April, 2022 08/ac
B. Shiva Shankar
Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
