Ms Royal Wealth Company and Others v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Objectionable order list regarding an appeal against a DRT judgment filed under SARFAESI Act due to Supreme Court order extending limitation; application withdrawn for defect correction.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.17/2022 Date: 04/04 /2022
M/s. Royal Wealth Company and Ors. ..………...Appellants
Vs.
The Authorised Officer, State Bank Of India & Ors. ……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Nemani Srinivas.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of M/s. Royal Wealth Company and Ors against the order dated 05-08-2021 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-Visakhapatnam. Application fees of Rs.50005/- vide T.R. no.115446 dt.02-02-2022 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate Mr. Nemani Srinivas.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The instant appeal is presented before this Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal seeking benefit of the solemn orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India firstly on March23,2020 in SMW(C) No. 3 of 2020, subsequently on September 23,2021 in Miscellaneous Case No.665 of of 2021 and lastly on January 10, 2022 in Miscellaneous Cases no.21 of 2022 read with Miscellaneous Case no.29 of 2022 dated January 10, 2022 extending the period of limitation for the period 15-03-2020 till March1,2022 for preferring appeals and filing applications. The impugned order and judgment is passed by the Ld. Tribunal on August 5, 2021. Leave shall be craved to produce the solemn orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Royal Wealth Company and Ors.
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, State Bank Of India & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court