State Bank of India v. Sri Anshuman Mishra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order granting four weeks time to the respondent to file opposition in an appeal filed by State Bank of India arising from DRT Cuttack.
What did the court decide?
Time granted for filing opposition
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 52 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 04 of 2019 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 23.08.2022 | State Bank of India … Appellant -Vs- Prafulla Kumar Mishra & 4 Others … Respondents |
|---|---|
| Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Appellant |
|
| Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 5 |
|
| None for Respondents No. 1 to 4 |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Despite service none appears to represent Respondents No. 1 to 4.
Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 5 prays for, and is granted, four weeks time to file Opposition with advance copy to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List on 15th November, 2022 for hearing of the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Prafulla Kumar Mishra
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court