Rabindranth Roy And Anr. v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as it was not pressed by the appellant, who submitted that the matter was settled between the parties, with no objection from the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal Dy. No. 51 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 26 of 2018 in DRT-2 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
23.08.2022
Rabindra Nath Roy & Anr.
… Appellant
-Vs-
State Bank of Inida
… Respondents
Mr. R. S. Tewari, learned counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Deblina Lahiri, Learned Counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter is settled between the parties. Learned counsel further submits that appellant does not want to press the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent does not raise objection. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rabindra Nath Roy & Anr.
- respondent
State Bank of Inida
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090000512019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court