Interview regarding the treatment of an appellate order on payment delay and availability of counsel.
Respondent awarded time for next hearing; payment of Rs.7,000/- upheld as paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present :Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 52/2019
Between
M/s. Shekhar Enterprises & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
A.O. / C.E.O., Tirupati Urban Co-operative …Respondent/s Bank Ltd.
Mr. U. N. Fuladi a/w Mr. S. N. Fuladi, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Aarti Singh, i/b Mr. P.D. Meghe, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated :09/05/2022:-
Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1 is paying a sum of Rs.7,000/- to Ld. Counsel for the Appellant by way Pay Order which was ordered to be paid. Even though payment belatedly made, delay is condoned and amount is considered to be paid.
Ld. counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank seeks time for hearing on the ground that the arguing counsel is not available today.
Both parties are directed to get ready for hearing on the next date, positively.
Post on 06.07.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-22
1
M/s. Shekhar Enterprises & Ors.
A.O. / C.E.O., Tirupati Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
