The Tribunal granted the respondents further time to file a reply, conditional on the appellants serving copies of the applications. A prior status-quo order continues until further orders.
Reply to be filed within two weeks if any. Status-quo order continues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 257/2022
Between
M/s. Llyod’s Fast Food & Restaurant & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Canara Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Sachin Kaikini, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. Akbar Rizvi, i/b M/s. AKS Legal Consultants, Advocate for Respondent No.1 & 2.
Ms. Vishakha Madhwani, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
-: Order dated : 06/05/2022 :-
Learned counsels for Respondent seek further time for reply stating that the copies of the applications have not been received.
Learned counsel for Appellants undertakes to serve the copies.
Hence, reply if any, shall be filed within two weeks.
Post on 06.06.2022 for filing reply / hearing.
Status-quo order granted by this Tribunal on 27.04.2022
shall continue until further orders.
dpj/mks-8
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to extend time for filing reply by the respondents due to non-receipt of copies of applications.
M/s. Llyod's Fast Food & Restaurant & Ors.
Canara Bank & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
