Union Bank of India v. Harsharatna Industries Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY No./625/2021, Date. 26/08/2022
Union Bank of India ………… Applicants
V/s.
M/s. Harsharatna Industries Ltd. & 29 Ors …………. Respondents
Ld. Counsel Mr. Dipanjan Dutta along with Ld. Counsel Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury is present on behalf of applicant and file affidavit of service. Postal tracking reports are showing that services upon respondent No.3,5,6,11,14,15,23,25,28,29 & 30 are confirmed. Whereas respondent No.1,4,7,8,9,10,12,13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22, 24,26 & 27 are not confirmed.
Ld. Counsel pray substituted service through newspaper publication for respondent No.1,4,7,8,9,10,12,13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,24,26 & 27.
Ld. Counsel Mr. Nemani Srinivas is present for respondent No.2 & 3.
None present for other respondents.
Service upon Respondent Nos. 1,4,7,8,9,10,12,13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,24,26 & 27 be served by way of paper publication to be published in two widely circulated local daily newspapers; one in English and the other in vernacular, and file affidavit of service on the next date.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
M/s. Harsharatna Industries Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court