Bonthu Aruna v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dealing with service of summons on respondent No. 1 to 7 in DRAT appeal. Appellant's counsel present; Respondent No. 1 counsel present; other respondents absent. Directed newspaper publication for service to other respondents.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY. NO. 10/2019 Date : 25/08/2022
BonthuAruna………………….Appellant
Vs
State Bank of India &Ors……………………..Respondents
Ld. Counsel Mr. Monohar Reddy is present on behalf of Appellant and files affidavit of service. Postal tracking reports are showing that service upon Respondent No. 1 is confirmed whereas services upon Respondent No. 2 to 7 are not confirmed.
Ld. Counsel also for appellant prays for newspaper publication of summons upon respondent Nos. 2 to 7.
Ld. Counsel Ms. Mekhala Kanji is present on behalf of Respondent No.1 and submits that she has not received the copy of appeal memo and related document. She also submits that scan copy of vakalatnama was filed and prays for submit to file fresh vakalatnama by next date.
Ld. Counsel for appellant is directed to serve the copy of appeal memo upon Ld. Counsel for respondent No.1.
None present for other respondents.
Service upon Respondents No. 2 to 7 be served by way of paper publication to be published in two widely circulated local daily newspapers; one in English and the other in vernacular, and file affidavit of service on the next date.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bonthu Aruna
- respondent
State Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court