This short order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata dismissed Appeal No. 238 of 2018 in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant,学习态度while the respondent's counsel was present. Pending applications stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 238 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 129 of 2018 in DRT-2, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.05.2022 Mithu Banerjee … Appellants -vsState Bank of India … Respondent
None for Appellant
Ms. Subhasree Dey, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up on the revised call. None is present for the Appellant, though Learned Counsel for Respondent is present.
The appeal, being Appeal No. 238 of 2018, is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. Record be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson Dated: 6th May, 2022 12/ac
Mithu Banerjee
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
