State Bank of India v. Virendra Kumar Kushwaha and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
null
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent counsel to serve reply to appellant for filing rejoinder.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 42/2022 Date: 22.07.2022
State Bank of India Vs. Virendra Kumar Kushwaha & Ors.
Present: Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Aman K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondents no. 1 & 2, Shri Shailendra Kumar, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that reply filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 & 2 has not been served to him.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 is directed to serve the copy of reply to the counsel for the appellant, who may file rejoinder by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 may also file reply by the next date.
List this case on 26.09.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Virendra Kumar Kushwaha & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court