Idbi Bank Ltd. v. Shri Atul Punj & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order records the disposal of the invalid interlocutory notice. Notice is served on the counsel of respondent no.1 and reply/rejoinder timeline fixed. The matter does not dispose of the appeal onmerits.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 42/2022 Arising out of O.A. No. 2/2020 (DRT-II, Delhi)
IDBI Bank Ltd. Vs Shri Atul Punj & Ors.
09.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Krishan Kumar, Ld.. counsel for appellant Mr. Mohd. Nausheen Samar for Mr. Pallav Saxena, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Notice. Mr. Mohd. Nausheen Samar accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1/Caveator. He states that he has not been furnished with the appeal paper book. Let the same be supplied to the counsel for respondent no.1 today itself through e-mail. Let reply be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter.
List on 02.08.2022. Other respondents be served in the meanwhile for the aforesaid date.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Parties & counsel
- appellant
IDBI Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Shri Atul Punj
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court