Avaniben a. Modi v. Punjab and Sindh Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjourned order granting the respondent bank time to file Vakalatnama and reply while postponing the matter for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 38/2009
Between
Smt. Avaniben Ajaybhai Modi … Appellant/s V/s. Punjab & Sindh Bank & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr. Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Shahid Husain, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated : 23/06/2022 :-
Mr. Shahid Husain, Advocate, proposes to represent the Respondent Bank and seeks time to file Vakalatnama and reply.
The Respondent shall file Vakaltnama and reply, if any, within three weeks with advance copy to the other side.
Post on 01.09.2022 for filing Vakalatnama / hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-30
1
Smt. Avaniben Ajaybhai Modi
Punjab & Sindh Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court