In this appeal, no representation was filed by the Appellants. The Tribunal listed the case for consideration of two interim applications regarding delay in and restoration of the appeal, without deciding the merits of the main appeal or the applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):37/2016
Jalaja Doddanna & Anr. . ... Appellant Vs AO, Sri Sharda Mahila Co-op Bank Ltd ... Respondent
04/04/2022
No representation for Appellants.
Learned Counsel Mr. Subbu Ranga Bharathi for Respondent No. 1 Bank is present.
At the request of Counsel for the Respondent No.1 Bank, list the case on 10.06.2022, for consideration of IA 321/2020 (delay in restoration) & IA 322/2020 (restoration).
Sd./-
Chairperson
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal deserves consideration in the absence of any representation for the Appellants.
Jalaja Doddanna & Anr.
AO, Sri Sharda Mahila Co-op Bank Ltd
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
