The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed IA 321/2020 filed for condonation of delay in restoration without any representation from the appellants, leading to consequent dismissal of the related restoration application.
Restoration application dismissed for default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 321/2020 In R.A(S.A):37/2016
Jalaja Doddanna & Anr. V/S Ao, Sri Sharda Mahila Co-Op Bank Ltd
17/10/2022
No representation for Petitioners/Appellants. On 23.09.2022 also, there was no representation for Petitioners/Appellants.
IA 321/2020 is filed by Petitioners/Appellants to condone delay of 264 days in filing Restoration Application.
To give an opportunity to Petitioners/Appellants, matter is kept under the caption “for dismissal”. In spite of that Petitioners/Appellants evinced no interest in prosecuting the Applications. Therefore, IA 321/2020 is dismissed for default. Consequently other Application viz., IA 322/2020 (restoration) is dismissed.
Sd/Chairperson
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the restoration application should be condoned.
Jalaja Doddanna & Anr.
Sharda Mahila Co-Op Bank Ltd
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
