Bank of Baroda v. M/S Swastik Corporation and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order granting_extensions to file a reply in an appeal. Respondents were allowed three weeks to file a reply.
What did the court decide?
time granted to file a reply within three weeks
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 347/2006
Between
Bank of Baroda. … Appellant/s
V/s.
M/s. Swastik Corporation & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Sanjay Upadhyay` i/b M/s. K. D. Shukla & Co., Advocate for the Appellant.
Ms Jaishree, i/b Ms Saagita Bhandare, Advocate for Respondent No. 5.
Mr Harjot Singh, i/b M/s. Raval Shah & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 7.
-: Order dated: 14/09/2022:-
All the Respondents have been served and Respondents Nos. 5 and 7 appeared through Counsel.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondents seeks time to file a reply.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the other side.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
M/s. Swastik Corporation
- respondent
Respondent No. 5
- respondent
Respondent No. 7
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court