The Bench treated a change in the Vakaltnama for the Appellant Bank as a direction for parties to be ready positively on the next date without granting further adjournments in Appeal No. 251/2007.
No further adjournment; matter posted for hearing on 02.11.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 251/2007
Between
State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. M/s. Swati Diamonds & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms Jayanthy. K.B., i/b M/s. Rony & Co., Advocate for Appellant. Ms Vaishali R. Bhilare, Advocate for Respondent No.11
-: Order dated: 13/09/2022:-
There is a change in Vakaltnama for the Appellant State Bank of India. The fresh Vakaltnama is being filed for the Appellant Bank and the Ld. Counsel seeks further time for the hearing.
Being a matter of the year 2007, the parties are directed to get ready positively on the next date, positively. No further adjournment will be granted.
Post on 02.11.2022 for hearing.
mks-17
1
State Bank of India
M/s. Swati Diamonds
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
