State Bank of India v. Maddi Vasantha Lakshmi
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 34 of 2021
(Arising out of S.A. 288 of 2018 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
21.11.2022 State Bank of India … Appellant -VsMaddi Vasantha Lakshmi & Another … Respondents Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. T. Jeevan, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Respondent No. 1 files opposition with copy to the Bank; who prays for and is granted three weeks time to file rejoinder.
Respondent No. 2 prays for and is granted three weeks time to file reply to the appeal, if any.
List on 17th February, 2023 for hearing of the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 21st November, 2022
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Maddi Vasantha Lakshmi
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court