The tribunal disposed of the appeal based on the respondent bank's submission that the dispute was settled in Lok Adalat. No representation appeared for the appellant.
Appeal disposed of on settlement in Lok Adalat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 298 of 2018
(Arising out of T.A. 60 of 2015 in O.A. 25 of 2011 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
21.11.2022 Balai Chand Basak … Appellant -VsCanara Bank & 3 Others … Respondents None for the Appellant
Mr. Omkar Ganguly, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Omkar Ganguly, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank submits that the matter has been settled in the Lok Adalat and endorses the same on the Memo of Appeal.
None appears to represent the Appellant.
In view of the above submission, the appeal, being Appeal No. 298 of 2018, stands disposed of.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 21st November, 2022 15/ac
Balai Chand Basak
Canara Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
