The tribunal recoded the matter as set for ex-parte hearing in the absence of response from the respondents following an earlier amendment order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 338/2015
Between
The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank … Appellant/s V/s. Mr. Yogeshchandra C Purohit&Ors. …Respondent/s MrRajduttKakde, i/b MrAkash Acharya, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 29/08/2022:-
The amendment as per order dated 04.07.2022 has been carried
out.
There is no representation for the Respondents. The Respondents are, therefore, called absent and set ex-parte. Post the matter on 03.11.2022 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-13
1
The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank
Mr. Yogeshchandra C Purohit&Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
