An appeal before the DRAT at Mumbai where the appellant sought a time extension. The respondent was absent and the matter was posted for an ex-parte hearing.
Time conceded; responding party absent; matter posted for ex-parte hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 335/2015
Between
State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. Canara Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Rajdutt V. Kakde, i/b Mr. Pravin Patel, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated : 22/06/2022 :- The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks time for hearing.
There is no representation for the Respondents. All Respondents called absent and set ex-parte. Post on 07.09.2022 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-13
1
State Bank of India
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
