Regular appeal listed for service. Notice to absent respondents ordered by publication; fresh service affidavit required by next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 313/2015 Date: 14.12.2022
Vikash Goel Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors.
Present: Shri Varchaswa Dwivedi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the other respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Ashok Pandey is out of station, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
The office report dated 13.12.2022 shows that the reply of the respondent-Bank has been filed, but no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 to 7 inspite of several opportunities being granted. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The said report further shows that notices sent to the respondent nos. 8 & 9 have returned back with endorsement “after much search, addressee could not be found” and no affidavit of service has been filed.
Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 8 & 9 through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case for service on 28.03.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Vikash Goel
Oriental Bank of Commerce
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
