Shri Anirudh Prasad Singh and Anr. v. Central Bank of India and Ors.

Appeal Dy. No. 401/2019 Date: 13.12.2022

Shri Anirudh Prasad Singh & Anr. Vs. Central Bank of India & Ors.

Present: Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the appellants, Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the respondent no. 4-Auction Purchaser,

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on the I.A. No. 686/2022 being correction application, wherein it has been stated that in first paragraph of the order dated 15.11.2022, due to inadvertent mistake, it has been mentioned that “the counsel for the appellant states that status quo order has been flouted”, but in fact the submission was that “status quo order has not been flouted”, therefore, necessary correction be made.

In view of the above, the correction application is allowed and the sentence “status quo order has been flouted” be read as “status quo order has not been flouted” and necessary correction has already been made in the order dated 15.11.2022.

The office report dated 12.12.2022 shows that the deficit court fee of Rs. 62,500/- is required to be deposited by the appellant and the reply of the respondent nos. 1 & 2 has been filed, but no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4-Auction Purchaser. Let the auction purchaser file reply by the next date.

List this case on 02.02.2023 for reply.

Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson