On the submission that the matter was settled and the amount was paid, the appellant's appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Appeal No. 306 of 2018 dismissed as withdrawn; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 306 of 2018)
(Arising out of O.A.614 of 2012 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.07.2022 M/s Surasani Construction … Appellant -VsKotak Mahindra Bank Limited. … Respondent Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant Ms. Rituparna Sanyal, Learned Counsel for Respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that the matter has been settled and amount has been paid. Learned counsel for Respondent has no objection.
In view of the above submission, appeal being Appeal No. 306 of 2018, is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
File be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 6th July, 2022 05/rc
M/s Surasani Construction
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
