M/S. Pearl Opticals Ltd. v. Indusind Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 302/2016
Between M/s. Pearl Opticals Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Indusind Bank Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Sarita G., i/b Mr. Manmohan Rao, Advocate for Official Liquidator of Appellant.
Mr. Raju Shinde along with Ms. Tamil Selvi, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Sanjay Upadhyay, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Ms. Aarti Suvarna, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6.
Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 to 11.
-: Order dated : 10/05/2022 :-
It is submitted that amendment is carried out and
Respondent No.2 (Dena Bank) is substituted with Bank of Baroda.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Pearl Opticals Ltd.
- respondent
Indusind Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court