Allowed
M/S. Pearl Opticals Ltd. v. Indusind Bank Limited
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/302/2016
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 103/2021
in
Appeal No. 302/2016
Between
M/s Pearl Opticals Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Indusind Bank Limited & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Alok D. Mishra, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Tamil Saliv Laxman, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. Laxmi Ingale, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
Ms. Sarika G., Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
Ms. Aarti Suvarna, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 & 6. Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Respondent No. 7 to 11.
-: Order dated : 28/03/2022 :-
I.A. No.103 of 2021 for amending of the cause title pertaining to Respondent No.2 (Dena Bank) which has now merged with Bank of Baroda is allowed.
Appellant is directed to carry out amended within two weeks. Post on 10.05.2022 for hearing along with I.A. No. 35/2021.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-22
1
M/s Pearl Opticals Ltd.
Indusind Bank Limited & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court