The Tribunal addressed a defect in an application to substitute the appellant bank following its merger with Indian Bank, directing the party to cure the objections raised by the registry.
Appellant directed to cure defects in the substitution application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present :Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 296/2016
Between
Allahabad Bank V/s.
Ross Murarka (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
Mr. Naval Tanwar, i/b M/s. VNA Legal, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Shobha Chavan, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated :09/05/2022 :-
Appellant has filed application for substitution of the Appellant Bank which has now merged with Indian Bank.
Registry has raised certain objections.
Appellant is directed to cure those defects.
Post on 01.06.2022 for compliance/steps.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-10
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for substitution of the appellant bank with the successor bank pending merger is maintainable or what are the defects in the application.
Ross Murarka (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
