Tribunal extended the status quo order dated 31.10.2019 till the next date of hearing, adjourning the case for 01.09.2022 while granting time to the respondent-Bank to file a supplementary affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 27/2020 Date: 20.05.2022
Mukesh Kumar Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Present: Shri Arif Iqbal, counsel for the appellant, Shri R. K. Chaurasia, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vikram Bhalla, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Miss Suchita Mehrotra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ujjawal Satsangi, counsel for the respondent no. 3-Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank prays for time to file supplementary affidavit to bring on record some documents, which are relevant to the controversy in the present case. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn attention to the earlier order dated 31.10.2019, whereby status quo order was granted. It is contended that the said interim order may be extended to protect the interest of the appellant.
In view of the aforesaid, the status quo order granted by this Tribunal on 31.10.2019 is extended and shall remain operative till next date.
List this case on 01.09.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Mukesh Kumar
Bank of Baroda
Respondent no. 3-Auction Purchaser
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
