Mukesh Kumar v. Bank of Baroda and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Neither party appeared. Direction to appellant's counsel to obtain clarification from the Bank regarding the impleadment of a legal heir. Adjourned.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 27/2020 Date: 23.11.2022
Mukesh Kumar Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Present: Shri Arif Iqbal, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank, Shri Ujjawal Satsangi, counsel for the respondent no. 3- Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that only clarification, which was required to be given by the learned counsel for the respondent-bank, is whether the legal heir of the mortgagor was brought on record after the death of Chandra Kishore Prasad Singh, which has not been done by the learned counsel for the respondent-bank. Let the clarification be given by the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to inform the counsel for the respondent-Bank about the order passed today in writing within 48 hours.
List this case on 21.02.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare
Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mukesh Kumar
- respondent
Bank of Baroda & Others
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court