Appeal No.264 of 2018 in DRT-3, Kolkata was dismissed in default as the appellant was non-present, pending applications were deemed infructuous, and interim orders vacated.
The appeal is dismissed in default; pending I.A.s stand dismissed as infructuous; interim orders stand vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No.264 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 293 of 2018 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.04.2022 Allahabad Bank … Appellant -vsSubrata Biswas & Another … Respondents
None for Appellant
Mr. Arya Nandi, Learned Counsel for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up on the revised call. None is present for the Appellant.
The appeal, being Appeal No. 264 of 2018, is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stands dismissed, being infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Record be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22nd April, 2022
02/ac
Allahabad Bank
Subrata Biswas & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
