Disposed
Central Bank Of India v. Howrah Light Steel Casting
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/263/2018
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed substitution of Respondent No. 3, who was deceased.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 263 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 158 of 2015 in DRT-1, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.05.2022 Central Bank of India … Appellants -vsHowrah Light Steel Casting … Respondent
Mr. Surath Chakraborty, representing Mr. Gautam Chkraborty, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray with Ms. Debdutta Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2
Mr. Rudra Dev Bagchi and Mr. Subhojit Chatterjee, led by Mr. A.K. Dhandhania, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 134 of 2022
This application is for substitution of Respondent No. 3, since deceased. The application is allowed being in time.
Applicant to carry out amendment within a period of three days. Substituted Respondent No. 3 (a), 3 (b) and 3 (c) and 3 (d) may
file opposition within four weeks; advance copy whereof be supplied to the Appellant; rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
Application, being I.A. 134 of 2022, is disposed of.
List the matter on 20th July, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 6th May, 2022 10/ac
Central Bank of India
Howrah Light Steel Casting
Respondent No. 3 (Deceased)
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court