Disposed
M/s Hindusthan Agencies v. Taraknath Das
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/26/2020
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 26 of 2020
(Arising out of S.A. 37 of 2018 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
21.12.2022 M/s. Hindusthan Agencies … Appellant -VsTarak Nath Das & Others … Respondents Mr. Rahul Poddar with Mr. Pranit Bag, Learned Counsel for Appellant
None for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 2, 3 and 4/ Bank of Baroda
Mr. A. K. Dhandhania with Ms. Sweta Mishra, Learned Counsel for the Intervenor/Respondent No. 5
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 5 prays for and is granted two weeks time and no more to file opposition with advance copy to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List on 18th January, 2023 for hearing of the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated:21st December, 2022 01/ac
M/s. Hindusthan Agencies
Tarak Nath Das
Others
Respondent No. 5
Bank of Baroda
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court