This court listed the case for determination of limitation on 03.08.2022 and recorded priors arrangements for adjournment. No substantive decision on merits or impugned order was rendered. No hearing or notice proceedings were concluded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 251/2018 Date: 12.04.2022
M/s Chhota Nagpur Mineral Enterprises & Anr. Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri P. K. Bajpai, counsel for the appellants, Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the respondent-Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 11.04.2022 shows that the notices sent to the respondent nos. 3 & 4 have returned back with endorsement “refused”. In view of the same, the service of notice on the said respondents is deemed to be sufficient and the matter is directed to be proceeded ex-parte against them.
Learned counsel for the appellants prays for adjournment on the ground of some personal reason. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank does not have any objection to it.
List this case on 03.08.2022 for limitation.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
M/s Chhota Nagpur Mineral Enterprises & Anr.
State Bank of India & Ors.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
