List of proceeds from DRT appeals adjourned due to respondent's counsel contracting COVID-19; no substantive order passed.
List of parties involves recovery proceedings adjourned for the convenience of counsel due to illness; no substantive legal principle laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 24/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 5/2021 (DRT-II, Delhi)
The Authorized Officer, India Bulls Asset Housing finance Ltd. Vs Paramjeet Singh Sehra & Anr.
&
Appeal No. 25/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 4/2021 (DRT-III, Delhi)
The Authorized Officer, Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Vs Paramjeet Singh Sehra & Anr.
25.07.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mohit Badhu and Manisha Saroha, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Mr. Mayank Pathak, proxy for Mr. Shashank Pathak, Ld. counsel for respondents.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Arguments concluded by Ld. senior counsel for the appellant.
Proxy counsel for respondents submits that Mr. Shashank Pathak, main counsel, is down with COVID-19 and prays for an adjournment. At his request, adjourn to 02.08.2022 for arguments on behalf of respondents.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
The Authorized Officer, India Bulls Asset Housing finance Ltd.
The Authorized Officer, Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
Paramjeet Singh Sehra
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
