The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent as their main counsel was unavailable, directing the filing of a reply and rejoinder, and listed the matter for hearing on a delay condonation application.
Request for adjournment allowed. Reply to be filed within four weeks; rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. Next hearing for 06.04.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.25/2020 Arising out of T.S.A.No.79/2015 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Punjab National Bank Vs Ashok Kumar Arora
18.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Ajay Shankar, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Himanshu proxy for Ms. Sonia Singh, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Proxy counsel for respondent request for an adjournment on the ground that main counsel is in personal difficulty today and seek time to file reply. Request allowed.
Let reply be filed by the respondent within four weeks and rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter by the appellant.
List the matter for 06.04.2023 for hearing on the application for condonation of delay(I.A. No. 98/2020).
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Punjab National Bank
Ashok Kumar Arora
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
