Dismissed
Icici Bank Limited v. Pawan Kumar Ruia and Ors.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/229/2018
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 229 of 2018)
(Arising out of O.A. 299 of 2013 in DRT, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.04.2022 ICICI Bank Limited
… Appellant
-vs-
Pawan Kumar Ruia … Respondent
None for Appellant
Ms. Jayati Chowdhury Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the second round.
I have gone through the record and find that this appeal is against an interim order, dated 20th January, 2018, passed by the Learned Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal-1, Kolkata wherein the Tribunal below has not passed any restraint order against the Respondent to go abroad, however, certain conditions were imposed. It appears that the order, by efflux of time, has become infructuous.
However, since none is appearing to press the appeal, even on the second call, without going into the merits of the appeal, the appeal is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, accordingly stand dismissed; being infructuous.
File be sent to Record Room.
Copy of the order be uploaded in the website of this Tribunal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 6th April, 2022 04/ac
ICICI Bank Limited
Pawan Kumar Ruia
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court