Ifci Limited v. Madhucon Infra Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench order adjourning appeal on request for time to obtain bank instructions despite existing directions to file response.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 48 of 2021)
(Arising out of T.S.A. 858 of 2017 in DRT, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.04.2022 IFCI Limited … Appellant -vsMadhucon Infra Limited & Another … Respondents
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-in-opposition has been filed by Respondents; and copy has been served upon the Appellant.
It appears that despite specific order passed on 14th of March, 2022, no reply has yet been filed.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent prays for time since he has yet to receive instructions the Bank.
When a specific direction was given to file response within a stipulated time, it was the duty of the concerned Bank Officers to send necessary instructions to the Learned Counsel.
On the request of Learned Counsel for the Appellant, the matter stands adjourned for the day.
List the matter on 25th April, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 6th April, 2022 12/ac
IFCI Limited
Madhucon Infra Limited
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court