The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by ICICI Bank Ltd. against an order of DRT-II, Delhi, due to the appellant's absence from the video conference hearing.
The appeal is dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.224/2022 Arising out of O.A. No.556/2019 (DRT-II, Delhi)
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Zapdoor Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
15.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
No one has appeared on behalf of appellant despite repeated calls. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Zapdoor Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
